Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35342848›Full record

ArticleLaparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery2022

Emergency robotic colorectal surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective case series study.

Vicky Maertens, Samuel Stefan, Emma Rawlinson, Chris Ball, Paul Gibbs, Stuart Mercer, Jim S Khan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A new combined prognostic model involvingTranslational cancer research · 2025
    Article
  6. Robotic surgery in emergency general surgery: an overview of UK practice.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer emergencies.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Vicky MaertensDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, UK.
Samuel StefanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, UK.
Emma RawlinsonDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, UK.
Chris BallRadiology Department, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, UK.
Paul GibbsCare Group Director of Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, UK.
Stuart MercerDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, UK.
Jim S KhanDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals University, NHS Trust, UK.
Queen Alexandra Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: While interest in elective robotic surgery is growing, use in emergency setting remains limited due to challenges posed by sicker patients, advanced pathology and logistical issues. During the COVID-19 pandemic, robotic surgery could provide the benefit of having the surgeon away from the bedside and reducing the number of directly exposed medical staff. The objective of this study was to report patient outcomes and initial learning experience of emergency robotic colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A case series study was conducted, including patients undergoing emergency robotic colorectal surgery between February 2020 and February 2021 at Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth, UK. Patient data were collected from an ethics approved prospective database. Patient demographics, operative time, conversions and postoperative complications were recorded. In addition, readmissions, length of stay and short-term oncological outcomes were analyzed. Results: Ten patients with median age 64 y (range, 36-83 y) were included. Four patients had robotic complete mesocolic resection for obstructing cancers. Six had colorectal resections for benign disease in emergency setting. All were R0 with a mean lymph node harvest of 54 ± 13. Mean operative time was 249 ± 117 min, the median length of stay was 9.4 d (range, 5-22 d). Only one patient was given a temporary diverting ileostomy. There were no grade III/V complications and no 30-day mortality. Conclusions: Provided an experienced team and peri-operative planning, emergency robotic colorectal surgery can achieve favorable outcomes with benefits of radical lymph node dissection in oncological cases and avoidance of diverting stoma.

Indexed as

COVID-19Emergency surgeryMinimally invasive surgeryRobotic colorectal surgery

Identifiers

PMID35342848
PMCPMC8938261
OpenAlexW4221091658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.