ArticleLaparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery2022
Emergency robotic colorectal surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective case series study.
Article in Laparoscopic, endoscopic, and robotic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic surgery in colorectal emergencies: a systematic review of current evidence.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Pooled it
- Current evidence and reported experiences for robot-assisted emergency general surgery: systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic Surgery in Acute Care: A Systematic Review of Its Role in Visceral Trauma and Emergency General Surgery.Cureus · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and robotic surgery in emergency gastrointestinal procedures: a review of current evidence and future directions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- A new combined prognostic model involvingTranslational cancer research · 2025Article
- Robotic surgery in emergency general surgery: an overview of UK practice.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
- Robotic emergency general surgery, future or fallacy?: case-matched comparison of operative and clinical outcomes during the adoption phase in a tertiary centre.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer emergencies.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- The role of RObotic surgery in EMergency setting (ROEM): protocol for a multicentre, observational, prospective international study on the use of robotic platform in emergency surgery.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Observational
- Article
- What do nurses experience in communication when assisting in robotic surgery: an integrative literature review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Clinical presentation, management, screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: While interest in elective robotic surgery is growing, use in emergency setting remains limited due to challenges posed by sicker patients, advanced pathology and logistical issues. During the COVID-19 pandemic, robotic surgery could provide the benefit of having the surgeon away from the bedside and reducing the number of directly exposed medical staff. The objective of this study was to report patient outcomes and initial learning experience of emergency robotic colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A case series study was conducted, including patients undergoing emergency robotic colorectal surgery between February 2020 and February 2021 at Queen Alexandra Hospital in Portsmouth, UK. Patient data were collected from an ethics approved prospective database. Patient demographics, operative time, conversions and postoperative complications were recorded. In addition, readmissions, length of stay and short-term oncological outcomes were analyzed. Results: Ten patients with median age 64 y (range, 36-83 y) were included. Four patients had robotic complete mesocolic resection for obstructing cancers. Six had colorectal resections for benign disease in emergency setting. All were R0 with a mean lymph node harvest of 54 ± 13. Mean operative time was 249 ± 117 min, the median length of stay was 9.4 d (range, 5-22 d). Only one patient was given a temporary diverting ileostomy. There were no grade III/V complications and no 30-day mortality. Conclusions: Provided an experienced team and peri-operative planning, emergency robotic colorectal surgery can achieve favorable outcomes with benefits of radical lymph node dissection in oncological cases and avoidance of diverting stoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.