Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35342658›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2022

A New Normal: Assessment Outcomes and Recommendations for Virtual Versus In-Person Curricula in Post-COVID-19 Times.

Eileen Cowan, Beth Altschafl, Julie Foertsch, Denise Barnes, Michael Lasarev, Elaine Pelley

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eileen CowanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6677-416X
Beth AltschaflAcademic Affairs, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7908-7799
Julie FoertschAcademic Affairs, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI USA.
Denise BarnesAcademic Affairs, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9214-9608
Michael LasarevDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1896-2705
Elaine PelleyDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3454-1588
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 response efforts that began in March 2020 prompted an urgent need to transition medical education from an in-person to a virtual format. Our aim is to provide evaluation of a virtual platform for a fully integrated curriculum to provide future guidance in teaching methods. Materials and Methods: We used summative assessments and course evaluations from pre- and post-transition from in-person to virtual delivery of educational content to measure the impacts of this transition on student performance and perceptions. Additionally, we surveyed students about their in-person versus online educational preferences. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in student knowledge acquisition as assessed by weighted averages of summative assessments when comparing an in-person to a virtual educational platform. While the transition to virtual learning was initially well-received by students, our studied cohorts gave lower scores for the overall learning experience after prolonged virtual learning ( Conclusions: Although student knowledge acquisition remained stable on a virtual platform, the student learning experience varied. We recommend that when returning to a new normal after COVID-19 restrictions are lifted, sessions that require 3-dimensional or group learning should remain in-person, while other educational activities may be offered on a virtual platform and that, whenever virtual learning is employed, attention be paid to ensuring ongoing social and academic engagement between learners and faculty.

Indexed as

AssessmentBurnoutCOVID-19Distance educationMedical studentVirtual

Identifiers

PMID35342658
PMCPMC8933749
OpenAlexW4221067457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.