Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35342632›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Psychosocial predictors of anxiety and depression in a sample of healthcare workers in Botswana during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

Anthony A Olashore, Keneilwe Molebatsi, Otsetswe Musindo, Kagiso Bojosi, Isaac Obadia, Onkabetse Julia Molefe-Baikai, Stephane Tshitenge, Philip Opondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Prevalence and predictors of postpartum depression among women attending clinics in Gaborone.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2025
    Article
  5. Physical Activity Reduces Depression among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Jordan.Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health : CP & EMH · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anthony A OlashoreDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7608-0671
Keneilwe MolebatsiDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Otsetswe MusindoDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Kagiso BojosiDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Isaac ObadiaDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Onkabetse Julia Molefe-BaikaiDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3371-4611
Stephane TshitengeDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Philip OpondoDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6005-9309

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on healthcare workers across multiple hospitals in different districts in Botswana. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in five public-funded hospitals from three districts in Botswana from 1 June 2020 to 30 October 2020. We used the neuroticism subscale of the 44-item Big Five Inventory, Patient Health Questionnaire, the Oslo 3-item Social Support Scale, the Anxiety Rating Scale, and the 14-item Resilience Scale to obtain data from 355 healthcare workers. Results: The participants' mean age (standard deviation) was 33.77 (6.84) years. More females (207, 59%) responded than males (144, 41%). Anxiety and depression were experienced by 14% and 23% of the participants, respectively. After multiple regression analyses, neuroticism predicted depression ( Conclusion: There is a need to develop and implement interventions targeted at these identified risk and protective factors that can be easily delivered to healthcare workers during this pandemic.

Indexed as

anxietydepressionhealthcare professionalsPsychological impactresilience

Identifiers

PMID35342632
PMCPMC8941707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.