Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35342628›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Obstetric analgesia utilization in labor pain management and associated factors among obstetric care providers in the West Shewa Zone, Central Ethiopia.

Eba Abera Terfasa, Gizachew Abdissa Bulto, Dereje Yadesa Irenso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eba Abera TerfasaMaternity and Reproductive Health Nursing, Oromia Regional Health Bureau, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gizachew Abdissa BultoDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4390-1418
Dereje Yadesa IrensoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences and Referral Hospital, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Ambo University · ETOromiyaa Regional Health Bureau · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Labor pain is the worst pain that almost every woman experiences during childbirth. Labor pain management plays a crucial role in promoting maternal-wellbeing, contributing enormously to maternal satisfaction with the childbirth experience and the high quality of services. Although there have been previous studies, they have primarily been conducted at referral or general hospitals located in urban settings. Thus, this study aimed to assess the utilization of labor pain analgesia and associated factors among obstetric care providers at all levels of health facilities in central Ethiopia. Methods: A multicenter institution-based cross-sectional study design was employed from 1 July to 30 September 2020. Simple random sampling using the lottery method was employed to select 399 obstetric care providers. The data were entered into Epi-data version 4.2 and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify the associated factors. The adjusted odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval and p value ⩽ 0.05 were used to identify associated factors. Results: The overall utilization of obstetric analgesia was 46% (95% confidence interval: 41.2%-50.8%). Being a Midwife (adjusted odds ratio: 2.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-3.47), having heard of the World Health Organization pain ladder (adjusted odds ratio: 2.95, 95% confidence interval: 1.73-5.01), having favorable attitude (adjusted odds ratio: 1.89, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-3.05), the expectation of obstetric care providers about labor pain (adjusted odds ratio: 3.26, 95% confidence interval: 1.27-8.36), having training on labor pain management (adjusted odds ratio: 2.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.03-6.07), and presence of chance for preference of obstetric analgesia for mothers in the facility (adjusted odds ratio = 2.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.33-3.98) were identified as factors significantly associated with the practice of obstetric analgesia among obstetric care providers. Conclusion: The overall use of labor pain management methods among obstetric care providers is low. Professional category, provider attitude, labor pain severity expectations, and having training were found to be factors associated with the use of obstetric analgesia. Therefore, working on adapting and disseminating the harmonized guideline and protocols on labor pain management and provision of training for obstetric care providers on labor pain management techniques were recommended.

Indexed as

obstetric analgesiaobstetric care providersUtilizationWest Shewa Zone

Identifiers

PMID35342628
PMCPMC8943529
OpenAlexW4220953854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.