ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2022
Effective Intense Pulsed Light Protocol in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Acne Vulgaris of the Chest and Back.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exposome involvement in the development of acne vulgaris.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Combining 675 nm Laser with Isotretinoin for Enhanced Acne Vulgaris Treatment Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Acne-induced pathological scars: pathophysiology and current treatments.Burns & trauma · 2024Review
- Truncal Acne and Scarring: A Comprehensive Review of Current Medical and Cosmetic Approaches to Treatment and Patient Management.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2023Review
- The Combination of Red and Blue Light, Radiofrequency and Intense Pulsed Light for the Treatment of Facial Postacne Erythema.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acne is defined as a chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous units, mainly affecting the face of young adults, but the chest and back can be involved as well. Oral antibiotics, topical retinoids, azelaic acid, benzoyl peroxide, and isotretinoin represent the most common treatment used for the treatment of acne, but several adverse effects and a lack of durable remission, with poor adherence by the patients, have been reported thus far. Lasers have been shown to be effective and safe to treat acne; intense pulsed light (IPL) demonstrates high efficacy rates, minimal discomfort, rapid recovery times, and excellent cosmetic and therapeutic outcomes. Objective: In this prospective study, we assessed the efficacy, safety, and reproducibility of a novel IPL protocol as a monotherapy in the treatment of acne of the chest and back. Methods: We included patients (N=50) aged 14 to 30 who presented with moderate papulopustular acne sited on the chest and back (Cook's Acne Grading Scale method 4-6, Pillsbury Scale III-IV). We performed four IPL sessions at two-week intervals on each patient. Results: An excellent outcome was achieved in 50 percent of the patients and a good outcome in the 35 percent of the patients. Patients experienced light erythema and mild burning as the most common side effects, which spontaneously resolved within 24 to 96 hours. Conclusion: Consistent with previous reports, our study demonstrated IPL to be a safe and effective treatment for severe cases of acne on the chest and back, providing excellent aesthetic and therapeutic results in 85 percent of treated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35342499PMC8944285W4221146898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.