Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35342476›Full record

ArticleActa endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)

Actualities in neonatal endocrine and metabolic screening.

V Dima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Gestational Alloimune Liver Disease-Case Report.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. CUTTING EDGE TRIO-WGS IN RARE GENETIC SYNDROME DIAGNOSIS.Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

V Dima"Filantropia" Clinical Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal metabolic screening has proven to be an important tool for the early detection of innate metabolic errors. Despite the fact that simple and effective methods of testing for metabolic diseases have been identified since the middle of the twentieth century, no consensus has been reached so far on the content of neonatal metabolic screening panels. There are large differences between countries in the number of metabolic diseases identified through national metabolic screening programs, ranging from zero to several tens, the most common testing being for phenylketonuria and congenital hypothyroidism (including in Romania). Given the fact that rare but treatable diseases have been identified in recent decades, reducing the financial burden on the health system, it would be useful to include them in the national neonatal metabolic screening program.

Indexed as

consensuscostsexpansioninnate metabolic errorsneonatal metabolic screening

Identifiers

PMID35342476
PMCPMC8919488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.