Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35342230›Full record

ArticlePolitical geography2022

Selective border permeability: Governing complex environmental issues through and beyond COVID-19.

Michelle A Miller, Rini Astuti, Philip Hirsch, Melissa Marschke, Jonathan Rigg, Poonam Saksena-Taylor, Diana Suhardiman, Zu Dienle Tan, David M Taylor, Helena Varkkey

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Political geography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Michelle A MillerAsia Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Asia Research Institute AS8, #07-22, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, 119260, Singapore.
Rini AstutiCrawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Postal address: 132 Lennox Crossing, Canberra, A.C.T, 2600, Australia.
Philip HirschSchool of Geosciences, University of Sydney, 224 Mu 5, Nong Kwai, Hang Dong, Chiang Mai, 50230 , Thailand.
Melissa MarschkeSchool of International and Development Studies, University of Ottawa, Faculty of Social Sciences, 120 University Private, Social Sciences Building, Rm 8005, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Jonathan RiggSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Faculty of Science, University of Bristol, BS8 1SS, United Kingdom.
Poonam Saksena-TaylorDepartment of Geography, National University of Singapore, 1 Arts Link, #03-01 Block AS2, 117570, Singapore.
Diana SuhardimanInternational Water Management Institute, IWMI-SEA, P.O. Box 4199, Vientiane, Laos.
Zu Dienle TanDepartment of Geography, National University of Singapore, 1 Arts Link, #03-01 Block AS2, 117570, Singapore.
David M TaylorDepartment of Geography, National University of Singapore, 1 Arts Link, #03-01 Block AS2, 117570, Singapore.
Helena VarkkeyDepartment of International and Strategic Studies, Universiti Malaya, B-6-23, 10 Semantan, Jalan Semantan, Bukit Damansara, 50490, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
National University of Singapore · SGAustralian National University · AULao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit · LAUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Malaya · MYUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 has changed the permeability of borders in transboundary environmental governance regimes. While borders have always been selectively permeable, the pandemic has reconfigured the nature of cross-border flows of people, natural resources, finances and technologies. This has altered the availability of spaces for enacting sustainability initiatives within and between countries. In Southeast Asia, national governments and businesses seeking to expedite economic recovery from the pandemic-induced recession have selectively re-opened borders by accelerating production and revitalizing agro-export growth. Widening regional inequities have also contributed to increased cross-border flows of illicit commodities, such as trafficked wildlife. At the same time, border restrictions under the exigencies of controlling the pandemic have led to a rolling back and scaling down of transboundary environmental agreements, regulations and programs, with important implications for environmental democracy, socio-ecological justice and sustainability. Drawing on evidence from Southeast Asia, the article assesses the policy challenges and opportunities posed by the shifting permeability of borders for organising and operationalising environmental activities at different scales of transboundary governance.

Indexed as

ASEANBordersCOVID-19Critical geopoliticsSelective permeabilityTransboundary environmental governance

Identifiers

PMID35342230
PMCPMC8938190
OpenAlexW4220928101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.