ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2022
Community Health Worker-Led Community Clinical on the U.S. / Mexico Border: Lessons Learned.
Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of community health workers in a collaborative care management intervention for cancer pain management: a feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial.Annals of palliative medicine · 2025Trial
- "If that goes away, the house of cards falls": challenges and solutions to ensuring CHW sustainability.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Risk factors associated with loneliness among mexican-origin adults in southern Arizona.BMC public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-clinical linkages (CCLs) connect public health organizations and health care providers to better support patients. Community health workers (CHWs), representatives from priority populations with special connections to their community, can lead CCLs.
objectivesOur objective was to learn about how to conduct a CHW-led CCL from the perspectives of those implementing the intervention.
methodsWe conducted focus groups with CHWs and their supervisors and regularly consulted community partners while coding and analyzing data.
resultsWe learned that CHWs thrive when supported by peers, supervisors, institutions, and researchers. Supervisors- who are new to the CHW role-should consider seeking training in CHW professional development and performance evaluation. Focus group participants agreed that by balancing the strengths and weaknesses of their organization, CHW-led CCLs benefit patients because the collaboration helps them to better manage their health.
conclusionsFuture CHW-led CCL practitioners should consider how to best institutionally support CHWs to maximize benefits for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.