Trial reportJournal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Positive Psychology Intervention in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of PERMA model-based positive psychological intervention on fear of disease progression and subjective well-being in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Psychological consistency network characteristics and influencing factors in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention treatment.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- Adherence to rehabilitation exercise and influencing factors among people with acute stroke: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Temporal dynamics and long-term effects of a mindfulness-based intervention for young adults with adverse childhood experiences.Mindfulness · 2024Article
- Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: Exploring the Latest Advances and Gaps in Disparities, Psychosocial and Symptom Management Interventions, and Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease Care.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2024Review
- Positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular health.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Review
- Quality of life and its association with predictors in lung transplant recipients: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBoth positive (e.g., optimism, well-being) and negative (e.g., stress, depressive symptoms) psychological constructs are associated with cardiovascular health. Positive psychology interventions (PPIs), which involve the cultivation of well-being through systematic activities, have the potential to enhance positive constructs and reduce negative ones; however, there has been limited study of PPIs in individuals with coronary heart disease. OBJECTIVE AND
methodsThis 3-arm, randomized controlled pilot trial investigated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an 8-week, group-based PPI, compared with group-based cognitive-behavioral therapy and treatment as usual, in patients with coronary heart disease. Assessments were completed at baseline, 9 weeks postintervention, and 15-week follow-up, and outcomes included C-reactive protein, happiness, optimism, psychological distress, and depressive symptoms.
resultsEighty-four patients with coronary heart disease were included (mean age = 57.6 ± 8.3; 13.1% female). Participants in the PPI group completed 6.8 (standard deviation 1.3) of 8 sessions (85%), and the majority of PPI (96%) participants completed ≥5 out of the 8 sessions. PPI exercises were rated as easy to complete and subjectively useful, and PPI participants reported a high likelihood of continuing them after the intervention. In preliminary efficacy analyses, there were no consistent treatment effects of the PPI on C-reactive protein levels compared with treatment as usual and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Finally, the PPI was associated with nonsignificant, small- to medium-sized greater improvements in psychological outcomes compared with treatment as usual and cognitive-behavioral therapy at 9 and 15 weeks.
conclusionsAmong individuals with coronary heart disease, a group-based PPI was feasible, well-accepted, and associated with preliminary, nonsignificant, small- to medium-sized improvements in mental health compared with treatment as usual and cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.