Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35341765›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2022

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) lobe-binding subunit Rpa12.2 promotes RNA cleavage and proofreading.

Katrin Schwank, Catharina Schmid, Tobias Fremter, Philipp Milkereit, Joachim Griesenbeck, Herbert Tschochner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Transcription Kinetics in the Coronavirus Life Cycle.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katrin SchwankUniversität Regensburg, Regensburg Center of Biochemistry (RCB), Lehrstuhl Biochemie III, Regensburg, Germany.
Catharina SchmidUniversität Regensburg, Regensburg Center of Biochemistry (RCB), Lehrstuhl Biochemie III, Regensburg, Germany.
Tobias FremterUniversität Regensburg, Regensburg Center of Biochemistry (RCB), Lehrstuhl Biochemie III, Regensburg, Germany.
Philipp MilkereitUniversität Regensburg, Regensburg Center of Biochemistry (RCB), Lehrstuhl Biochemie III, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: philipp.milkereit@ur.de.
Joachim GriesenbeckUniversität Regensburg, Regensburg Center of Biochemistry (RCB), Lehrstuhl Biochemie III, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: joachim.griesenbeck@ur.de.
Herbert TschochnerUniversität Regensburg, Regensburg Center of Biochemistry (RCB), Lehrstuhl Biochemie III, Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: herbert.tschochner@ur.de.
University of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elongating nuclear RNA polymerases (Pols) frequently pause, backtrack, and are then reactivated by endonucleolytic cleavage. Pol backtracking and RNA cleavage are also crucial for proofreading, which contributes to transcription fidelity. RNA polymerase I (Pol I) of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae synthesizes exclusively 35S rRNA, the precursor transcript of mature ribosomal 5.8S, 18S, and 25S rRNA. Pol I contains the specific heterodimeric subunits Rpa34.5/49 and subunit Rpa12.2, which have been implicated in RNA cleavage and elongation activity, respectively. These subunits are associated with the Pol I lobe structure and encompass different structural domains, but the contribution of these domains to RNA elongation is unclear. Here, we used Pol I mutants or reconstituted Pol I enzymes to study the effects of these subunits and/or their distinct domains on RNA cleavage, backtracking, and transcription fidelity in defined in vitro systems. Our findings suggest that the presence of the intact C-terminal domain of Rpa12.2 is sufficient to support the cleavage reaction, but that the N-terminal domains of Rpa12.2 and the heterodimer facilitate backtracking and RNA cleavage. Since both N-terminal and C-terminal domains of Rpa12.2 were also required to faithfully incorporate NTPs in the growing RNA chain, efficient backtracking and RNA cleavage might be a prerequisite for transcription fidelity. We propose that RNA Pols containing efficient RNA cleavage activity are able to add and remove nucleotides until the matching nucleotide supports RNA chain elongation, whereas cleavage-deficient enzymes can escape this proofreading process by incorporating incorrect nucleotides.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiaeNucleotidesRNARNA CleavageRNA Polymerase ISaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription, GeneticNucleotidesRNARNA Polymerase IRPA12 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsbacktrackingnucleolusproofreadingribosomeRNA polymerase IRpa34.5Rpa49rRNATFIIStranscription

Identifiers

PMID35341765
PMCPMC9108883
OpenAlexW4220869839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.