Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35341665›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia2022

Right Heart Failure Management: Focus on Mechanical Support Options.

Meena Bhatia, Shawn Jia, Alan Smeltz, Priya A Kumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in Mechanical Support for Right Ventricular Failure.Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meena BhatiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address: meena_bhatia@med.unc.edu.
Shawn JiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Alan SmeltzDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Priya A KumarDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of American adults suffer from right heart failure (RHF), a condition associated with high rates of hospitalization, organ failure, and death. There is a multitude of etiologies and mechanisms that lead to RHF, often in a feedforward spiral of decline. The management of advanced cases of RHF can be particularly difficult. For patients who are refractory to the medical optimization of volume status, hemodynamic and pharmacologic support, and rhythm control, mechanical therapies may be warranted. Currently available mechanical assist devices for RHF include venoarterial extracorporeal oxygenation and right ventricular assist devices, both surgical and percutaneous. Each advanced therapy has its own potential advantages and limitations, and often is appropriate in different clinical contexts. In this review, the authors describe the pathophysiology and medical therapies for RHF and then focus on the different types of advanced therapies that currently exist to help inform medical decision-making for this complicated patient cohort.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureAdultCohort StudiesHemodynamicsHumansImpella RPProtekDuoRight heart failureTandemHeartventricular assist devices

Identifiers

PMID35341665
OpenAlexW4212876313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.