Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35341647›Full record

Trial reportVaccine2022

A randomized clinical trial of a booster dose with low versus standard dose of AZD1222 in adult after 2 doses of inactivated vaccines.

Sira Nanthapisal, Thanyawee Puthanakit, Peera Jaru-Ampornpan, Rapisa Nantanee, Pimpayao Sodsai, Orawan Himananto, Jiratchaya Sophonphan, Pintip Suchartlikitwong, Narin Hiransuthikul, Pornpimon Angkasekwinai and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sira NanthapisalDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand; Research Unit in Infectious and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand; Clinical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Thanyawee PuthanakitCenter of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Electronic address: thanyawee.p@chula.ac.th.
Peera Jaru-AmpornpanVirology and Cell Technology Research Team, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC).
Rapisa NantaneeCenter of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Unit, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pimpayao SodsaiCenter of Excellence in Immunology and Immune-mediated Diseases, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Orawan HimanantoMonoclonal Antibody Production and Application Research Team, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (BIOTEC).
Jiratchaya SophonphanThe HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration (HIV-NAT), The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pintip SuchartlikitwongDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narin HiransuthikulDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pornpimon AngkasekwinaiDepartment of Medical Technology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand; Research Unit in Molecular Pathogenesis and Immunology of Infectious Diseases, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand; Research Unit in Infectious and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Auchara TangsathapornpongDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand; Research Unit in Infectious and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Nattiya HirankarnCenter of Excellence in Immunology and Immune-mediated Diseases, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
study team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunogenicity of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine has waning antibody over time. With the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant, which requires higher neutralizing antibody to prevent infection, a booster dose is needed.

objectiveTo evaluate immunogenicity and reactogenicity of standard- versus low-dose ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine booster after CoronaVac in healthy adults.

methodsA double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of adult, aged 18-59 years, with completion of 2-dose CoronaVac at 21-28 days apart for more than 2 months was conducted. Participants were randomized to receive AZD1222 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) intramuscularly; standard dose (SD, 5x10

resultsFrom July-August 2021, 422 adults with median age of 44 (IQR 36-51) years were enrolled. The median interval from CoronaVac to AZD1222 booster was 77 (IQR 64-95) days. At baseline, geometric means (GMs) of sVNT against delta variant and anti-S-RBD IgG were 18.1%inhibition (95% CI 16.4-20.0) and 111.5 (105.1-118.3) BAU/ml. GMs of sVNT against delta variant and anti-S-RBD IgG in SD were 95.6%inhibition (95% CI 94.3-97.0) and 1975.1 (1841.7-2118.2) BAU/ml at day 14, and 89.4%inhibition (86.4-92.4) and 938.6 (859.9-1024.4) BAU/ml at day 90, respectively. GMRs of sVNT against delta variant and anti-S-RBD IgG in LD compared to SD were 1.00 (95% CI 0.98-1.02) and 0.84 (0.76-0.93) at day 14, and 0.98 (0.94-1.03) and 0.89 (0.79-1.00) at day 90, respectively. LD recipients had significantly lower rate of fever (6.8% vs 25.0%) and myalgia (51.9% vs 70.7%) compared to SD.

conclusionHalf-dose AZD1222 booster after 2-dose inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination had non-inferior immunogenicity, yet lower systemic reactogenicity. Fractional low-dose AZD1222 booster should be considered especially in resource-constrained settings.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultAntibodies, ViralChAdOx1 nCoV-19HumansImmunogenicity, VaccineImmunoglobulin GMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, InactivatedAntibodies, ViralChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GVaccines, Inactivatedanti-SARS-CoV-2 IgGAZD1222Booster doseChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccineCoronaVac vaccineNeutralizing antibody titerSARS-CoV-2 vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35341647
PMCPMC8947780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.