Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35341403›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Self-motion with Hearing Impairment and (Directional) Hearing Aids.

Maartje M E Hendrikse, Theda Eichler, Volker Hohmann, Giso Grimm

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maartje M E HendrikseAuditory Signal Processing and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7704-6555
Theda EichlerAuditory Signal Processing and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Volker HohmannAuditory Signal Processing and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Giso GrimmAuditory Signal Processing and Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When listening to a sound source in everyday situations, typical movement behavior is highly individual and may not result in the listener directly facing the sound source. Behavioral differences can affect the performance of directional algorithms in hearing aids, as was shown in previous work by using head movement trajectories of normal-hearing (NH) listeners in acoustic simulations for noise-suppression performance predictions. However, the movement behavior of hearing-impaired (HI) listeners with or without hearing aids may differ, and hearing-aid users might adapt their self-motion to improve the performance of directional algorithms. This work investigates the influence of hearing impairment on self-motion, and the interaction of hearing aids with self-motion. In order to do this, the self-motion of three HI participant groups----aided with an adaptive differential microphone (ADM), aided without ADM, and unaided-was measured and compared to previously measured self-motion data from younger and older NH participants. Self-motion was measured in virtual audiovisual environments (VEs) in the laboratory, and the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and SNR improvement of the ADM resulting from the head movements of the participants were estimated using acoustic simulations. HI participants did almost all of the movement with their head and less with their eyes compared to NH participants, which led to a 0.3 dB increase in estimated SNR and to differences in estimated SNR improvement of the ADM. However, the self-motion of the HI participants aided with ADM was similar to that of other HI participants, indicating that the ADM did not cause listeners to adapt their self-motion.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsHearing LossSound LocalizationSpeech PerceptionHumansNoiseadaptive differential microphonehearing aidsself-motion

Identifiers

PMID35341403
PMCPMC8966140
OpenAlexW4221065062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.