ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Computational Intelligence Approaches in Developing Cyberattack Detection System.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Computational Intelligence Approaches in Developing Cyberattack Detection System.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-26Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Internet plays a fundamental part in relentless correspondence, so its applicability can decrease the impact of intrusions. Intrusions are defined as movements that unfavorably influence the focus of a computer. Intrusions may sacrifice the reputability, integrity, privacy, and accessibility of the assets attacked. A computer security system will be traded off when an intrusion happens. The novelty of the proposed intelligent cybersecurity system is its ability to protect Internet of Things (IoT) devices and any networks from incoming attacks. In this research, various machine learning and deep learning algorithms, namely, the quantum support vector machine (QSVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), linear discriminant and quadratic discriminant long short-term memory (LSTM), and autoencoder algorithms, were applied to detect attacks from signature databases. The correlation method was used to select important network features by finding the features with a high-percentage relationship between the dataset features and classes. As a result, nine features were selected. A one-hot encoding method was applied to convert the categorical features into numerical features. The validation of the system was verified by employing the benchmark KDD Cup database. Statistical analysis methods were applied to evaluate the results of the proposed study. Binary and multiple classifications were conducted to classify the normal and attack packets. Experimental results demonstrated that KNN and LSTM algorithms achieved better classification performance for developing intrusion detection systems; the accuracy of KNN and LSTM algorithms for binary classification was 98.55% and 97.28%, whereas the KNN and LSTM attained a high accuracy for multiple classification (98.28% and 970.7%). Finally, the KNN and LSTM algorithms are fitting-based intrusion detection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.