ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
An EEG-Based Neuromarketing Approach for Analyzing the Preference of an Electric Car.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electroencephalography-based neural indicators of texture preference for cosmetic formulations.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- The Neuroscience of Marketing: Noninvasive Neuromarketing Methods for Understanding Consumer Choice and Priorities.F1000Research · 2025Review
- A systematic review on EEG-based neuromarketing: recent trends and analyzing techniques.Brain informatics · 2024Review
- Neural mechanisms of expert persuasion on willingness to pay for sugar.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023Article
- An Ensemble Model for Consumer Emotion Prediction Using EEG Signals for Neuromarketing Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A systematic review of the prediction of consumer preference using EEG measures and machine-learning in neuromarketing research.Brain informatics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates consumer preference from the perspective of neuroscience when a choice is made among a number of cars, one of which is an electric car. Consumer neuroscience contributes to a systematic understanding of the underlying information processing and cognitions involved in choosing or preferring a product. This study aims to evaluate whether neural measures, which were implicitly extracted from brain activities, can be reliable or consistent with self-reported measures such as preference or liking. In an EEG-based experiment, the participants viewed images of automobiles and their specifications. Emotional and attentional stimuli and the participants' responses, in the form of decisions made, were meticulously distinguished and analyzed via signal processing techniques, statistical tests, and brain mapping tools. Long-range temporal correlations (LRTCs) were also calculated to investigate whether the preference of a product could affect the dynamic of neuronal fluctuations. Statistically significant spatiotemporal dynamical differences were then evaluated between those who select an electric car (which seemingly demands specific memory and long-term attention) and participants who choose other cars. The results showed increased PSD and central-parietal and central-frontal coherences at the alpha frequency band for those who selected the electric car. In addition, the findings showed the emergence of LRTCs or the ability of this group to integrate information over extended periods. Furthermore, the result of clustering subjects into two groups, using statistically significant discriminative EEG measures, was associated with the self-report data. The obtained results highlighted the promising role of intrinsically extracted measures on consumers' buying behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.