Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35341152›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Sex Difference of Effect of

Xueqing Duan, Xin Xie, Chen Zhu, Zhixuan Duan, Rui Chen, Jun Xu, Qi Zhang, Qi Yu, Weiyi Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Study on Masking the Bitterness of Chinese Medicine Decoction-Mate.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xueqing DuanGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Gui Yang 550025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9141-6516
Xin XieGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Gui Yang 550025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6539-9118
Chen ZhuGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Gui Yang 550025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1208-4048
Zhixuan DuanGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Gui Yang 550025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9811-4927
Rui ChenGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Gui Yang 550025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8774-8473
Jun XuGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Gui Yang 550025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1972-508X
Qi ZhangGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Gui Yang 550025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4144-5949
Qi YuGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Gui Yang 550025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4723-3288
Weiyi TianGuizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Gui Yang 550025, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4074-2255

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: By observing the sex difference of the gut microbiota in rats and the influence of Method: Taking samples of the jejunum (containing intestinal contents) and feces of 8-week-old rats, and detecting the composition of gut microbiota of females and males by 16S rRNA sequencing technology; At the same time, 8-week-old rats were gavaged with different doses of Result: (1) The gut microbiota of normal rats without administration also had obvious gender differences; (2) Conclusion: The effect of

Identifiers

PMID35341152
PMCPMC8941563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.