ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022
Direct Oral Anticoagulant removal by a DOAC filter: Impact on lupus anticoagulant testing - Evaluation on spiked and patient samples.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Usefulness and Limits of DOAC Removal Agents Based on Activated Charcoal in Thrombophilia Testing: Literature Review and Expert Proposals.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Coagulation assays for assessing the bypassing of factor Xa direct oral anticoagulants using VMX-C001.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Update on the Laboratory Diagnosis of Lupus Anticoagulant: Current Challenges and Clinical Involvement.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Lupus Anticoagulant Detection under the Magnifying Glass.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- The methods for removal of direct oral anticoagulants and heparins to improve the monitoring of hemostasis: a narrative literature review.Thrombosis journal · 2023Review
- Novel Ex Vivo DOAC Removal Methods Reduce Interference in Lupus Anticoagulant Testing.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Removal of Apixaban during Emergency Cardiac Surgery Using Hemoadsorption with a Porous Polymer Bead Sorbent.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Laboratory Diagnosis of Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights and Hindrances.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Direct Oral Anticoagulant removal by a DOAC filter: Impact on lupus anticoagulant testing - Evaluation on spiked and patient samples.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: DOAC Filter (DF) is a new device to overcome interference in lupus anticoagulant (LAC) testing by direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Objectives: We evaluated DOAC removal from plasma and elimination of DOAC interference in LAC testing by DF, and impact of DF on LAC assays in a representative patient cohort, including a comparison with DOAC-Stop (DS). Methods: Normal pooled plasma (NPP) was spiked with increasing concentrations of apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran. DOAC and LAC was measured on untreated, DF-treated, and DS-treated spiked samples. Coagulation parameters and thrombin generation were measured on patient samples (n = 20) before and after DF. Patients treated with DOAC, vitamin K antagonist, or heparin and nonanticoagulated patient samples (n = 139) were tested for LAC before and after DF. Results: In spiked NPP, levels were below the lower limit of quantification (LLoQ) after DF/DS treatment for all DOAC concentrations. Following DF, levels were below LLoQ for 53 of 56 DOAC-containing patient samples. Twenty-eight of 33 LAC-positive DOAC-containing samples became negative after filtration, whereas 5 remained LAC-positive (1/5 from a patient with antiphospholipid syndrome [APS]). Four LAC-positive DOAC-containing samples (from patients without APS), became negative after filtration, whereas they remained LAC positive after DS. In the non-DOAC patient groups following DF, LAC changed from positive to negative in 8 (due to a procoagulant effect) and vice versa in 2 cases. Conclusion: DF reduces DOAC interference in LAC testing. As incomplete DOAC removal may occur, DOAC measurements should be performed after filtration. A procoagulant effect after filtration may lead to erroneous LAC results in non-DOAC-containing samples. Therefore, using DF should be restricted to DOAC-containing samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.