Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35340979›Full record

ArticleApplied network science2022

The world trade network: country centrality and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Roberto Antonietti, Paolo Falbo, Fulvio Fontini, Rosanna Grassi, Giorgio Rizzini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied network science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19's Impact on International Trade.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto AntoniettiDepartment of Economics and Management, University of Padova, Via del Santo 33, 35123 Padova, Italy.
Paolo FalboDepartment of Economics and Management, University of Brescia, Contrada S. Chiara 50, 25122 Brescia, Italy.
Fulvio FontiniDepartment of Economics and Management, University of Padova, Via del Santo 33, 35123 Padova, Italy.
Rosanna GrassiDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano - Bicocca, Via Bicocca degli Arcimboldi, 8, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5292-1723
Giorgio RizziniDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano - Bicocca, Via Bicocca degli Arcimboldi, 8, 20126 Milan, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

International trade is based on a set of complex relationships between different countries that can be modelled as an extremely dense network of interconnected agents. On the one hand, this network might favour the economic growth of countries, but on the other, it can also favour the diffusion of diseases, such as COVID-19. In this paper, we study whether, and to what extent, the topology of the trade network can explain the rate of COVID-19 diffusion and mortality across countries. We compute the countries' centrality measures and we apply the community detection methodology based on communicability distance. We then use these measures as focal regressors in a negative binomial regression framework. In doing so, we also compare the effects of different measures of centrality. Our results show that the numbers of infections and fatalities are larger in countries with a higher centrality in the global trade network.

Indexed as

Centrality measuresCommunity detectionCOVID-19World trade network

Identifiers

PMID35340979
PMCPMC8935609
OpenAlexW4226106778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.