ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Comparative evaluation of optic nerve sheath diameter in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using low and standard pressures of gas insufflations.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic effects of low- and high-pressure pneumoperitoneum on optic nerve sheath diameter during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Effect on the size of optic nerve sheath diameter in patients undergoing surgeries under spinal anaesthesia versus peripheral nerve blocks - A randomised controlled study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Optic Nerve Changes Detected with Ocular Ultrasonography during Different Surgical Procedures: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Intra-abdominal insufflation of CO Material and Methods: Patients of age group 18-80 years planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into two groups; group S (standard pressure of 12-16 mmHg) and group L (low pressure of 8-10 mmHg) on the basis of intra-abdominal pressures used for the surgery. All were administered general anesthesia and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO Results: The demographic profile and operative times were comparable. ONSD was measured in 100 patients in each group for both the eyes and no patient had values above the cutoff value of 5.0 mm. No significant difference in the ONSD was observed at the above mentioned time intervals between the groups. There was a statistically significant lower value of the heart rate and mean arterial pressure in the low-pressure group. Conclusion: Intra-abdominal insufflation of CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.