ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
Flow dynamics of ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus block in adults.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psoas Compartment Block Versus Medial Branch Block for Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review of Anatomical Targets, Clinical Evidence, and Patient Selection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Efficacy of Low Volume Ultrasound-guided and Neurostimulation-aided Lumbosacral Plexus Block in Octogenarians Undergoing Proximal Femoral Nailing Surgery: A Pilot Study.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
- Dissimilar Planes and Approaches with Common Neural Targets - A Cadaveric Evaluation of Three Different Ultrasound-guided Fascial Plane Blocks for Lumbar Plexus Nerves.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The outcomes of plexus and peripheral nerve blocks depend on needle-nerve contact and the spread of local anesthetic (LA) around the plexus or nerve. Needle-nerve distance and spread of LA could be visualized during US-guided lumbar plexus block (LPB). Material and Methods: After Institutional Ethics Committee approval and after obtaining informed consent, 24 American Society of Anesthesiologists'-physical status I-III patients who underwent surgical fixation of fractures of proximal femur were enrolled. Spinal anesthesia was a primary anesthetic in all patients. At the end of the surgery, all patients received US and neurostimulation-aided LPB at the third lumbar nerve root (LNr). The primary aim was to determine the spread of LA in the lumbar plexus area with the relation of the needle tip and LNr contact. The secondary aim was to understand block efficacy in terms of pain scores monitored at regular intervals and 100 mg intravenous tramadol was administered as a rescue analgesic if VAS >4. Results: In all 24 patients, we observed an oval and antegrade LA spread after lumbar plexus was identified with neurostimulation at L3. With the needle closer to intervertebral foramina (IVF), a retrograde spread was visualized. Only 2/24 patients received rescue analgesia in the first 24 h. Conclusion: The type of spread after the US-guided LPB could predict block success of block and a possible epidural spread.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.