ArticleJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
A randomized comparison between pulse pressure variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing renal transplantation.
Article in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of intraoperative goal-directed therapy on perioperative outcomes in kidney transplantation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Trial
- Pulse Index Continuous Cardiac Output-Guided Hemodynamic Therapy in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2026Article
- Perioperative fluid management in kidney transplantation: What's new and future directives?World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- Perioperative considerations in kidney transplantation: An anaesthesiologist's perspective.World journal of transplantation · 2025Review
- Impact of FloTrac versus hypotension prediction index (HPI)-guided haemodynamic management on intraoperative hypotension in kidney transplantation: A retrospective observational study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Assessment of fluid responsiveness after tidal volume challenge in renal transplant recipients: a nonrandomized prospective interventional study.Clinical transplantation and research · 2024Article
- Pulse Pressure Variance (PPV)-Guided Fluid Management in Adult Patients Undergoing Supratentorial Tumor Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Current Commonly Used Dynamic Parameters and Monitoring Systems for Perioperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy: A Review.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2023Review
- Pulse pressure variation versus central venous pressure guided fluid management therapy in kidney transplant recipients: A single-blinded prospective randomized control study.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Intraoperative fluid management is important in renal transplant recipients with end-stage renal disease. Conventionally, central venous pressure (CVP) has been used to guide perioperative fluid administration but with high incidence of poor graft outcome. There is a requirement of reliable parameter to guide the fluid therapy in these patients so as to minimize the perioperative complications and improve the outcome. Hence, this study was conducted. Material and Methods: This prospective study included 75 patients of chronic kidney disease undergoing renal transplantation. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A (control group): Intraoperative fluids were guided by CVP; Group B: Intraoperative fluids were guided by pulse pressure variation (PPV). Primary outcome measure of this study was incidence of delayed graft functioning, i.e., need of hemodialysis within 7 days of renal transplant. Secondary outcome measures were incidence of perioperative hypotension, post-transplant pulmonary edema, tissue edema, and lactic acidosis. Results: Total amount of fluid before reperfusion was significantly greater in the control group ( Conclusion: Perioperative fluid guidance by PPV is better than central venous pressure in renal transplant patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.