Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35340854›Full record

ArticleChemical science2022

Pressing matter: why are ionic liquids so viscous?

Frederik Philippi, Daniel Rauber, Kira Lieberkind Eliasen, Nathalie Bouscharain, Kristine Niss, Christopher W M Kay, Tom Welton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Another Piece of the Ionic Liquid's Puzzle: Adsorption of ClThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2024
    Article
  16. Physical and Electrochemical Analysis ofInorganic chemistry · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Frederik PhilippiDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London White City Campus London W12 0BZ UK t.welton@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0127-8923
Daniel RauberDepartment of Chemistry, Saarland University Campus B2.2 Saarbrücken Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-4344
Kira Lieberkind Eliasen"Glass and Time", IMFUFA, Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University P.O. Box 260 DK-4000 Roskilde Denmark.
Nathalie BouscharainUniversity of Lyon, INSA Lyon, CNRS, LaMCoS, UMR 5259 69621 Villeurbanne France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2161-8443
Kristine Niss"Glass and Time", IMFUFA, Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University P.O. Box 260 DK-4000 Roskilde Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9391-0366
Christopher W M KayDepartment of Chemistry, Saarland University Campus B2.2 Saarbrücken Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5200-6004
Tom WeltonDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Sciences Research Hub, Imperial College London White City Campus London W12 0BZ UK t.welton@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1750-1683

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Room temperature ionic liquids are considered to have huge potential for practical applications such as batteries. However, their high viscosity presents a significant challenge to their use changing from niche to ubiquitous. The modelling and prediction of viscosity in ionic liquids is the subject of an ongoing debate involving two competing hypotheses: molecular and local mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID35340854
PMCPMC8890108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.