Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35340813›Full record

ReviewAdvances in orthopedics2022

The Clinical History and Basic Science Origins of Transcutaneous Osseointegration for Amputees.

Jason Shih Hoellwarth, Kevin Tetsworth, Muhammad Adeel Akhtar, Munjed Al Muderis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in orthopedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Lower extremity osseointegration for amputees with diabetes mellitus and vascular disease.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Clinical implementation of MRI for evaluation of titanium press-fit osseointegration implants.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jason Shih HoellwarthLimb Salvage and Amputee Reconstruction Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7065-0656
Kevin TetsworthDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3069-4141
Muhammad Adeel AkhtarTrauma and Orthopaedic Department, Victoria Hospital, NHS Fife, Kirkcaldy, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5593-7541
Munjed Al MuderisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, 3 Technology Pl, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2010-7185
Hospital for Special Surgery · USMacquarie University · AUNHS Fife · GBRoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcutaneous osseointegration for amputees (TOFA) refers to an intramedullary metal endoprosthesis which passes transcutaneously to connect with a limb exoprosthesis. The first recognizably modern experiments and attempts occurred in the 1940s. Multiple researchers using a plethora of materials and techniques over the following 50 years identified principles and obstacles which informed the first long-term successful surgery in 1990. Unfortunately, the current mainstream TOFA literature presents almost exclusively subsequent developments, generally omitting prior research, leading to some historical mistakes being repeated. Given the increasing interest and surgical volume of TOFA, this literature review was performed to delineate TOFA's basic science and surgical origins and to integrate these early efforts within the contemporary understanding. Studying this research could protect and benefit future patients, surgeons, and implant developers as TOFA is entering a phase of increased attention and innovation. The aim of this article is to provide a focused reference of foundational research, much of which is difficult to identify and retrieve, for clinicians and researchers.

Identifiers

PMID35340813
PMCPMC8956382
OpenAlexW4221014564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.