Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35340755›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2022

Evidence-based efficacy of methotrexate in adult Crohn's disease in different intestinal and extraintestinal indications.

Andrea Cassinotti, Alberto Batticciotto, Marco Parravicini, Maurizio Lombardo, Paolo Radice, Claudio Camillo Cortelezzi, Simone Segato, Federico Zanzi, Antonella Cappelli, Sergio Segato

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Immunomodulators: still having a role?Gastroenterology report · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution.

Andrea CassinottiGastroenterology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, viale Borri 57, 21100, Varese, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5733-048X
Alberto BatticciottoRheumatology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Marco ParraviciniGastroenterology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Maurizio LombardoDermatology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Paolo RadiceOphtalmology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Claudio Camillo CortelezziGastroenterology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Simone SegatoGastroenterology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Federico ZanziGastroenterology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Antonella CappelliRheumatology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Sergio SegatoGastroenterology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy.
Aziende Socio Sanitarie Territoriale dei Sette Laghi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methotrexate (MTX) is included in the therapeutic armamentarium of Crohn's disease (CD), although its positioning is currently uncertain in an era in which many effective biological drugs are available. No systematic reviews or meta-analysis have stratified the clinical outcomes of MTX according to the specific clinical scenarios of its use. Methods: Medline, PubMed and Scopus were used to extract eligible studies, from database inception to May 2021. A total of 163 studies were included. A systematic review was performed by stratifying the outcomes of MTX according to formulation, clinical indication and criteria of efficacy. Results: The use of MTX is supported by randomized clinical trials only in steroid-dependent CD, with similar outcomes to thiopurines. The use of MTX in patients with steroid-refractoriness, failure of thiopurines or in combination with biologics is not supported by high levels of evidence. Combination therapy with biologics can optimize the immunogenic profile of the biological drug, but the impact on long-term clinical outcomes is described only in small series with anti-TNFα. Other off-label uses, such as fistulizing disease, mucosal healing, postoperative prevention and extraintestinal manifestations, are described in small uncontrolled series. The best performance in most indications was shown by parenteral MTX, favouring higher doses (25 mg/week) in the induction phase. Discussion: Evidence from high-quality studies in favour of MTX is scarce and limited to the steroid-dependent disease, in which other drugs are the leading players today. Many limitations on study design have been found, such as the prevalence of retrospective underpowered studies and the lack of stratification of outcomes according to specific types of patients and formulations of MTX. Conclusion: MTX is a valid option as steroid-sparing agent in steroid-dependent CD. Numerous other clinical scenarios require well-designed clinical studies in terms of patient profile, drug formulation and dosage, and criteria of efficacy.

Indexed as

Crohn’s diseaseextraintestinal manifestationsmethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID35340755
PMCPMC8949794
OpenAlexW4226201638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.