Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35340667›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research letters : ERL [Web site]2019

Social-ecological network analysis for sustainability sciences: a systematic review and innovative research agenda for the future.

J S Sayles, M Mancilla Garcia, M Hamilton, S M Alexander, J A Baggio, A P Fischer, K Ingold, G R Meredith, J Pittman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evolution of system connectivity to support food production in the Indus Basin in Pakistan.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Including animals in sociology.Current sociology. La Sociologie contemporaine · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Marine conservation: towards a multi-layered network approach.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  15. Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J S SaylesORISE Fellow Appointed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology Division, Narragansett, RI, USA.
M Mancilla GarciaStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
M HamiltonSchool of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
S M AlexanderEnvironmental Change and Governance Group, Faculty of Environment, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
J A BaggioDepartment of Political Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA.
A P FischerSchool for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
K IngoldInstitute of Political Science and Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Switzerland.
G R MeredithDepartment of Environment and Society, Quinney College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.
J PittmanSchool of Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social-ecological network (SEN) concepts and tools are increasingly used in human-environment and sustainability sciences. We take stock of this budding research area to further show the strength of SEN analysis for complex human-environment settings, identify future synergies between SEN and wider human-environment research, and provide guidance about when to use different kinds of SEN approaches and models. We characterize SEN research along a spectrum specifying the degree of explicit network representation of system components and dynamics. We then systematically review one end of this spectrum, what we term "fully articulated SEN" studies, which specifically model unique social and ecological units and relationships. Results show more focus on methodological advancement and applied ends. While there has been some development and testing of theories, this remains an area for future work and would help develop SENs as a unique field of research, not just a method. Authors have studied diverse systems, while mainly focused on the problem of social-ecological fit alongside a scattering of other topics. There is strong potential, however, to engage other issues central to human-environment studies. Analyzing the simultaneous effects of multiple social, environmental, and coupled processes, change over time, and linking network structures to outcomes are also areas for future advancement. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of (fully articulated) SEN research, a necessary step that can help scholars develop comparable cases and fill research gaps.

Indexed as

environmental governancehuman-environment researchnatural resource managementSocial-ecological networkssocial-ecological systems

Identifiers

PMID35340667
PMCPMC8943837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.