ReviewBiophysical reviews2022
A bibliometric review of peripartum cardiomyopathy compared to other cardiomyopathies using artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gene Analysis of Four Families with Severe Peripartum Cardiomyopathy Reveals Known Gene Mutations and Supports the Recent Call for Screening.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Biophysical Reviews: from the umbra of 2020-2021 into the antumbra of 2022.Biophysical reviews · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As developments in artificial intelligence and machine learning become more widespread in healthcare, their potential to transform clinical outcomes also increases. Peripartum cardiomyopathy is a rare and poorly-characterised condition that presents as heart failure in the last trimester prior to delivery or within 5-6 months postpartum. The lack of a definitive understanding of the molecular causes and clinical progress of this condition suggests that bibliometrics will be well-suited to creating new insights into this serious clinical problem. We examine similarities and differences between peripartum and its closely related familial dilated cardiomyopathy and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Using PubMed as the source of bibliometric data, we apply artificial intelligence-supported natural language processing to compare extracted data and genes association with these cardiomyopathies. Gene data were enhanced with additional metadata from third-party datasets and then analysed for their impact and specificity for peripartum cardiomyopathy. Artificial intelligence identified 14 genes that distinguished peripartum from both dilated and familial dilated cardiomyopathy. They are as follows:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.