Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35340599›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2022

Paradoxes of Hymenoptera flight muscles, extreme machines.

Tony Hickey, Jules Devaux, Vijay Rajagopal, Amelia Power, David Crossman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Insect Flight: State of the Field and Future Directions.Integrative and comparative biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Condition dependence of the multimodal courtship of a parasitoid wasp (Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tony HickeySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jules DevauxSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Vijay RajagopalDepartment of Physiology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Amelia PowerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
David CrossmanFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Carboniferous, insects evolved flight. Intense selection drove for high performance and approximately 100 million years later, Hymenoptera (bees, wasps and ants) emerged. Some species had proportionately small wings, with apparently impossible aerodynamic challenges including a need for high frequency flight muscles (FMs), powered exclusively off aerobic pathways and resulting in extreme aerobic capacities. Modern insect FMs are the most refined and form large dense blocks that occupy 90% of the thorax. These can beat wings at 200 to 230 Hz, more than double that achieved by standard neuromuscular systems. To do so, rapid repolarisation was circumvented through evolution of asynchronous stimulation, stretch activation, elastic recoil and a paradoxically slow Ca

Indexed as

Adenylate diffusionAntsBeesCreatine kinaseExtreme contraction rateMitochondria

Identifiers

PMID35340599
PMCPMC8921419
OpenAlexW4213161290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.