Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35340560›Full record

ArticleEURASIP journal on image and video processing2022

Automatic kidney segmentation using 2.5D ResUNet and 2.5D DenseUNet for malignant potential analysis in complex renal cyst based on CT images.

Parin Kittipongdaja, Thitirat Siriborvornratanakul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EURASIP journal on image and video processing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. State of the art review of AI in renal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 2.5D MFFAU-Net: a convolutional neural network for kidney segmentation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parin KittipongdajaGraduate School of Applied Statistics, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thitirat SiriborvornratanakulGraduate School of Applied Statistics, National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6530-5302
National Institute of Development Administration · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bosniak renal cyst classification has been widely used in determining the complexity of a renal cyst. However, it turns out that about half of patients undergoing surgery for Bosniak category III, take surgical risks that reward them with no clinical benefit at all. This is because their pathological results reveal that the cysts are actually benign not malignant. This problem inspires us to use recently popular deep learning techniques and study alternative analytics methods for precise binary classification (benign or malignant tumor) on Computerized Tomography (CT) images. To achieve our goal, two consecutive steps are required-segmenting kidney organs or lesions from CT images then classifying the segmented kidneys. In this paper, we propose a study of kidney segmentation using 2.5D ResUNet and 2.5D DenseUNet for efficiently extracting intra-slice and inter-slice features. Our models are trained and validated on the public data set from Kidney Tumor Segmentation (KiTS19) challenge in two different training environments. As a result, all experimental models achieve high mean kidney Dice scores of at least 95% on the KiTS19 validation set consisting of 60 patients. Apart from the KiTS19 data set, we also conduct separate experiments on abdomen CT images of four Thai patients. Based on the four Thai patients, our experimental models show a drop in performance, where the best mean kidney Dice score is 87.60%.

Indexed as

2.5D convolutionComputed tomographyDeep learningDenseUNetKidney segmentationResUNet

Identifiers

PMID35340560
PMCPMC8938741
OpenAlexW4220708534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.