ArticleCureus2022
A Case Series of Secondary Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum and Pneumothorax in Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spontaneous Pneumomediastinum in COVID-19 and Myasthenic-like Symptom Complications in Two Relatives: A Coincidence or Spike Toxicity with Thymic Response in Predisposed Individuals? Two Clinical Cases with a Comprehensive Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [COVID-19-associated lung weakness (CALW): Systematic review and meta-analysis].Medicina intensiva · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax are uncommon complications in COVID-19 patients. The exact prevalence, etiology, and outcomes are not well known. We report a case series of patients in our institution with COVID-19 related pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax and address these questions. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of patients admitted at our institution with a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) confirming the diagnosis of COVID-19. A cohort of 500 potential study candidates was identified, of whom eight were investigated. Demographic data, hospital course, patient co-morbidities, and outcome data were collected. Results Eight patients were included in our study who were identified as having an event (i.e., pneumomediastinum and/or pneumothorax) during the specified timeframe. Overall, 62% of patients were on high-flow nasal cannula with an average FiO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.