Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35340428›Full record

ReviewiScience2022

Electrochemical CO

Alina Gawel, Theresa Jaster, Daniel Siegmund, Johannes Holzmann, Heiko Lohmann, Elias Klemm, Ulf-Peter Apfel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Heavy is the Crown: Crown Ether Modulation of Cobalt Porphyrin COAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  3. Covalent Organic Frameworks for Photocatalysis.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. COEnergy & fuels : an American Chemical Society journal · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sensitivity Analysis of One-Dimensional Multiphysics Simulation of COThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Selective and high-rate COChemical science · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alina GawelDepartment of Energy, Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology UMSICHT, Osterfelder Str. 3, 46047 Oberhausen, Germany.
Theresa JasterDepartment of Energy, Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology UMSICHT, Osterfelder Str. 3, 46047 Oberhausen, Germany.
Daniel SiegmundDepartment of Energy, Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology UMSICHT, Osterfelder Str. 3, 46047 Oberhausen, Germany.
Johannes HolzmannInstitute of Chemical Technology, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Heiko LohmannDepartment of Energy, Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology UMSICHT, Osterfelder Str. 3, 46047 Oberhausen, Germany.
Elias KlemmInstitute of Chemical Technology, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 55, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Ulf-Peter ApfelDepartment of Energy, Fraunhofer Institute for Environmental, Safety, and Energy Technology UMSICHT, Osterfelder Str. 3, 46047 Oberhausen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the efficient electrochemical conversion of CO

Indexed as

CatalysisEconomicsElectrochemistry

Identifiers

PMID35340428
PMCPMC8943412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.