ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Enhanced Feature Extraction-based CNN Approach for Epileptic Seizure Detection from EEG Signals.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sustainable E-Health: Energy-Efficient Tiny AI for Epileptic Seizure Detection via EEG.Biomedical engineering and computational biology · 2025Article
- Time-Series Anomaly Detection Based on Dynamic Temporal Graph Convolutional Network for Epilepsy Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Retracted: Enhanced Feature Extraction-Based CNN Approach for Epileptic Seizure Detection from EEG Signals.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- Looseness Identification of Track Fasteners Based on Ultra-Weak FBG Sensing Technology and Convolutional Autoencoder Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-05-24Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most common neurological disorders is epilepsy, which disturbs the nerve cell activity in the brain, causing seizures. Electroencephalography (EEG) signals are used to detect epilepsy and are considered standard techniques to diagnose epilepsy conditions. EEG monitors and records the brain activity of epilepsy patients, and these recordings are used in the diagnosis of epilepsy. However, extracting the information from the EEG recordings manually for detecting epileptic seizures is a difficult cumbersome, error-prone, and labor-intensive task. These negative attributes of the manual process increase the demand for implementing an automated model for the seizure detection process, which can classify seizure and nonseizures from EEG signals to help in the timely identification of epilepsy. Recently, deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) techniques have been used in the automatic detection of epileptic seizures because of their superior classification abilities. ML and DL algorithms can accurately classify different seizure conditions from large-scale EEG data and provide appropriate results for neurologists. This work presents a feature extraction-based convolutional neural network (CNN) to sense and classify different types of epileptic seizures from EEG signals. Different features are analyzed to classify seizures via EEG signals. Simulation analysis was managed to investigate the classification performance of the hybrid CNN-RNN model in terms of different achievement metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, f1 score, and false-positive rate. The results validate the efficacy of the CNN-RNN model for seizure detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.