Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35340135›Full record

ArticleObstetrics & gynecology science2022

Current techniques used to perform surgery for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse in South Korea.

Soo Rim Kim, Dong Hoon Suh, Woojeong Kim, Myung Jae Jeon

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics & gynecology science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Soo Rim KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Dong Hoon SuhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Woojeong KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Myung Jae JeonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Catholic Kwandong University International St. Mary's Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

Korean Urogynecologic Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the current surgical techniques for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair in South Korea.

methodsA web-based questionnaire survey was sent to 780 members of the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The items assessed in the questionnaire were the demographic characteristics and current surgical techniques used for the correction of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse.

resultsThe response rate was 16%. There were variations in the suture materials and methods used for anterior and posterior colporrhaphy. Most respondents used only rapid absorbable suture materials to plicate the fibromuscular layer and close the mucosal layer of the anterior and posterior vaginal wall. Simple interrupted sutures are the most popular suture method for both the fibromuscular and mucosal layers. Thirty-one and eleven percent of the respondents used mesh for surgical correction of anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse, respectively. Concomitant perineorrhaphy was routinely performed with posterior vaginal wall repair by 42% of the respondents, whereas 58% performed perineorrhaphy only in cases with perineal defects.

conclusionThere is considerable diversity in the current surgical techniques for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse repair in Korea. Further research is required to standardize the surgical techniques.

Indexed as

CystocelePelvic organ prolapseRectoceleSurveys and questionnairesSutures

Identifiers

PMID35340135
PMCPMC9119735
OpenAlexW4220794969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.