Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35340127›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2022

The formalin test does not probe inflammatory pain but excitotoxicity in rodent skin.

Tal Hoffmann, Florian Klemm, Tatjana I Kichko, Susanne K Sauer, Katrin Kistner, Bernhard Riedl, Patrick Raboisson, Lei Luo, Alexandru Babes, Laurence Kocher and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Tal HoffmannInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Florian KlemmInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tatjana I KichkoInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Susanne K SauerInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Katrin KistnerInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Bernhard RiedlInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Patrick RaboissonAstraZeneca, CNS and Pain Innovative Medicines Unit, Södertälje, Sweden.
Lei LuoAstraZeneca, CNS and Pain Innovative Medicines Unit, Södertälje, Sweden.
Alexandru BabesInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Laurence KocherInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Giancarlo CarliInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael J M FischerInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Peter W ReehInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4367-094X
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEAstraZeneca (Sweden) · SEHeidelberg University · DEUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Bucharest · ROUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most widely used formalin test to screen antinociceptive drug candidates is still apostrophized as targeting inflammatory pain, in spite of strong opposing evidence published. In our rat skin-nerve preparation ex vivo, recording from all classes of sensory single-fibers (n = 32), 30 units were transiently excited by formaldehyde concentrations 1-100 mM applied to receptive fields (RFs) for 3 min, C and Aδ-fibers being more sensitive (1-30 mM) than Aβ-fibers. From 30 mM on, ~1% of the concentration usually injected in vivo, all RFs were defunctionalized and conduction in an isolated sciatic nerve preparation was irreversibly blocked. Thus, formaldehyde, generated a state of 'anesthesia dolorosa' in the RFs in so far as after a quiescent interphase all fibers with unmyelinated terminals developed a second phase of vigorous discharge activity which correlated well in time course and magnitude with published pain-related behaviors. Sural nerve filament recordings in vivo confirmed that higher formalin concentrations (> 42 mM) have to be injected to the skin to induce this second phase of discharge. Patch-clamp and calcium-imaging confirmed TRPA1 as the primary transducer of formaldehyde (10 mM) effects on mouse sensory neurons. However, stimulated CGRP release from isolated skin of TRPA1

Indexed as

PainRodentiaAnimalsMicePain MeasurementRatsSensory Receptor CellsSkinanalgesiaformaldehydenociceptiontoxicokineticsTRPA1

Identifiers

PMID35340127
PMCPMC8957662
OpenAlexW4220823426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.