Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35340020›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2022

"Obvious" indications for Neural antibody testing in Epilepsy or Seizures: The ONES checklist.

Yiu-Chia Chang, Maryam Nabavi Nouri, Seyed Mirsattari, Jorge G Burneo, Adrian Budhram

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Autoimmune encephalitis-associated epilepsy.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yiu-Chia ChangDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Maryam Nabavi NouriDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-4890
Seyed MirsattariDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jorge G BurneoDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Adrian BudhramDepartment of Clinical Neurological Sciences, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-0470
Western University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNumerous predictive scores have been developed to help determine which patients with epilepsy or seizures of unknown etiology should undergo neural antibody testing. However, their diagnostic advantage compared to only performing testing in patients with "obvious" indications (e.g., broader features of autoimmune encephalitis, characteristic seizure semiologies) requires further study. We aimed to develop a checklist that identifies patients who have "obvious" indications for neural antibody testing and to compare its diagnostic performance to predictive scores.

methodsWe developed the "Obvious" indications for Neural antibody testing in Epilepsy or Seizures (ONES) checklist through literature review. We then retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent neural antibody testing for epilepsy or seizures at our center between March 2019 and January 2021, to determine and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the ONES checklist to the recently proposed Antibody Prevalence in Epilepsy and Encephalopathy (APE2)/Antibodies Contributing to Focal Epilepsy Signs and Symptoms (ACES) reflex score.

resultsOne-hundred seventy patients who underwent neural antibody testing for epilepsy or seizures were identified. Seventy-four of 170 (43.5%) with a known etiology were excluded from sensitivity/specificity analyses; none had a true-positive neural antibody. Of the 96 patients with an unknown etiology, 14 (15%) had a true-positive neural antibody. The proportion of false-positives was significantly higher among patients with a known etiology (3/3, 100%) compared to an unknown etiology (2/16, 13%; p = .01). There was no significant difference of the APE2/ACES reflex score compared to the ONES checklist with regard to sensitivity (93% for both, p > .99) or specificity (71% vs. 78%, p = .18) for true-positive neural antibodies. SIGNIFICANCE: Compared to only performing neural antibody testing in patients with epilepsy or seizures of unknown etiology who have "obvious" indications, predictive scores confer no clear diagnostic advantage. Prespecified definitions of what constitutes a true-positive neural antibody is required in future studies to avoid false-positives that can confound results.

Indexed as

EpilepsyHashimoto DiseaseAntibodiesAutoantibodiesChecklistHumansRetrospective StudiesSeizuresAntibodiesAutoantibodiesacute symptomatic seizures secondary to autoimmune encephalitisautoimmune-associated epilepsyautoimmune encephalitisautoimmune epilepsyautoimmune seizures

Identifiers

PMID35340020
PMCPMC9544067
OpenAlexW4220666650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.