Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35339900›Full record

Observational studyJournal of critical care2022

Clinical characteristics, physiological features, and outcomes associated with hypercapnia in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19---insights from the PRoVENT-COVID study.

Anissa M Tsonas, Michela Botta, Janneke Horn, Luis Morales-Quinteros, Antonio Artigas, Marcus J Schultz, Frederique Paulus, Ary Serpa Neto, PRoVENT-COVID Collaborative Group

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of critical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. PaCOJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. PaCOFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hypercapnia outcome in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients on mechanical ventilator: A retrospective observational cohort.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Carbon dioxide and MAPK signalling: towards therapy for inflammation.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Anissa M TsonasDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: a.m.tsonas@amsterdamumc.nl.
Michela BottaDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Janneke HornDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Luis Morales-QuinterosIntensive Care Unit, University General Hospital of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain; Servei de Medicina Intensive, Hospital Universitari Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; The Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; The Parc Taulí Research and Innovation Institute (I3PT), Sabadell, Spain.
Antonio ArtigasThe Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; The Parc Taulí Research and Innovation Institute (I3PT), Sabadell, Spain; Critical Care Center, University Hospital Parc Tauli, Sabadell, Spain; CIBER Enfermedades Respiratorias (ISCiii), Madrid, Spain.
Marcus J SchultzDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit (MORU), Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Frederique PaulusDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands; ACHIEVE, Centre of Applied Research, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ary Serpa NetoDepartment of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, location 'AMC', Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Data Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, Austin Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
PRoVENT-COVID Collaborative Group
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLAustin Hospital · AUCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESInstitute of Research and Innovation Parc Tauli · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe determined the incidence of hypercapnia and associations with outcome in invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients.

methodsPosthoc analysis of a national, multicenter, observational study in 22 ICUs. Patients were classified as 'hypercapnic' or 'normocapnic' in the first three days of invasive ventilation. Primary endpoint was prevalence of hypercapnia. Secondary endpoints were ventilator parameters, length of stay (LOS) in ICU and hospital, and mortality in ICU, hospital, at day 28 and 90.

resultsOf 824 patients, 485 (58.9%) were hypercapnic. Hypercapnic patients had a higher BMI and had COPD, severe ARDS and venous thromboembolic events more often. Hypercapnic patients were ventilated with lower tidal volumes, higher respiratory rates, higher driving pressures, and with more mechanical power of ventilation. Hypercapnic patients had comparable minute volumes but higher ventilatory ratios than normocapnic patients. In hypercapnic patients, ventilation and LOS in ICU and hospital was longer, but mortality was comparable to normocapnic patients.

conclusionHypercapnia occurs often in invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients. Main differences between hypercapnic and normocapnic patients are severity of ARDS, occurrence of venous thromboembolic events, and a higher ventilation ratio. Hypercapnia has an association with duration of ventilation and LOS in ICU and hospital, but not with mortality.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory InsufficiencyHumansHypercapniaRespiration, ArtificialARDSCO2 managementCoronavirus disease 2019COVID-19HypercapniaInvasive ventilationSustained hypercapniaVentilation

Identifiers

PMID35339900
PMCPMC8947815
OpenAlexW4221008266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.