Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35339778›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2022

Social Vulnerability and COVID-19: Changes in Trauma Activations at a Safety-Net Hospital.

Miriam Y Neufeld, Hyerim Jang, Elisa Caron, Reece Golz, Tejal S Brahmbhatt, Sabrina E Sanchez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miriam Y NeufeldBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: Miriam.Neufeld@bmc.org.
Hyerim JangBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elisa CaronBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Reece GolzDepartment of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Tejal S BrahmbhattBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sabrina E SanchezBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Impact of Biological, Clinical, and Social Determinants on Trauma and Trauma OutcomesT32GM086308 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Alik Farber, Daniel G. Remick · 2010 to 2026
$3.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM086308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFollowing the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were reports of decreased trauma hospitalizations, although violent crime persisted. COVID-19 has had the greatest impact on minoritized and vulnerable communities. Decreases in traumatic events may not extend to these communities, given pandemic-related socioeconomic and psychological burdens that increase the risk of exposure to trauma and violence. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study (n = 1634) of all trauma activations presenting to our institution January 1, 2020 to May 31, 2020, and same time periods in 2018 and 2019. Census tracts and associated Social Vulnerability Index quartiles were determined from patient addresses. Changes in trauma activations pre and post Massachusetts' state-of-emergency declaration compared to a historical control were analyzed using a difference-in-differences methodology.

resultsWeekly all-cause trauma activations fell from 26.44 to 8.25 (rate ratio = 0.36 [0.26, 0.50]) postdeclaration, with significant difference-in-differences compared to a historical control (P < 0.0001). Nonviolent trauma activations significantly decreased from 21.11 to 5.17 after the declaration (rate ratio = 0.27 [0.37, 0.91]; P < 0.0001), whereas there was no significant decrease in violent injury (5.33 to 3.08 rate ratio = 0.69 [0.39, 1.22]; P = 0.20). Stratified by vulnerability, the most vulnerable quartile had an increased proportion of all-cause trauma postdeclaration and had no decrease in violent trauma activations following the declaration compared to the historical control (rate ratio = 0.84 [0.38-1.86]; P = 0.67).

conclusionsThe state-of-emergency declaration was associated with significant decreases in overall trauma, to a greater extent in nonviolent injuries. Among those living in the most socially vulnerable communities, there was no decrease in violent trauma. These findings highlight the need for violence and injury prevention programs in vulnerable communities, particularly in times of crisis.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSafety-net ProvidersSocial VulnerabilityCOVID-19Social vulnerabilityTraumaViolent injury

Identifiers

PMID35339778
PMCPMC8860669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.