ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2022
Characterization of scar tissue biomechanics during adult murine flexor tendon healing.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recapitulating the Native Tendon Environment in a Synthetic 3D Anisotropic Hydrogel as an Engineered Extracellular Matrix.ACS applied bio materials · 2026Article
- Bioinspired Nanocomposite for Targeted Immunoengineering and Improved Tendon Regeneration.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Multifunctional Prussian lue nanozymes ameliorate tendinopathy via modulating tissue homeostasis.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Electrospun DegraPol Tube Delivering Stem Cell/Tenocyte Co-Culture-Derived Secretome to Transected Rabbit Achilles Tendon-In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) empowering tendon regenerative therapies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Therapeutic potential of GDF-5 for enhancing tendon regenerative healing.Regenerative therapy · 2024Review
- Effect of Aging on Tendon Biology, Biomechanics and Implications for Treatment Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Impact of aging on tendon homeostasis, tendinopathy development, and impaired healing.Connective tissue research · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tendon injuries are very common and result in significant impairments in mobility and quality of life. During healing, tendons produce a scar at the injury site, characterized by abundant and disorganized extracellular matrix and by permanent deficits in mechanical integrity compared to healthy tendon. Although a significant amount of work has been done to understand the healing process of tendons and to develop potential therapeutics for tendon regeneration, there is still a significant gap in terms of assessing the direct effects of therapeutics on the functional and material quality specifically of the scar tissue, and thus, on the overall tendon healing process. In this study, we focused on characterizing the mechanical properties of only the scar tissue in flexor digitorum longus (FDL) tendons during the proliferative and early remodeling healing phases and comparing these properties with the mechanical properties of the composite healing tissue. Our method was sensitive enough to identify significant differences in structural and material properties between the scar and tendon-scar composite tissues. To account for possible inaccuracies due to the small aspect ratio of scar tissue, we also applied inverse finite element analysis (iFEA) to compute mechanical properties based on simulated tests with accurate specimen geometries and boundary conditions. We found that the scar tissue linear tangent moduli calculated from iFEA were not significantly different from those calculated experimentally at all healing timepoints, validating our experimental findings, and suggesting the assumptions in our experimental calculations were accurate. Taken together, this study first demonstrates that due to the presence of uninjured stubs, testing composite healing tendons without isolating the scar tissue overestimates the material properties of the scar itself. Second, our scar isolation method promises to enable more direct assessment of how different treatment regimens (e.g., cellular ablation, biomechanical and/or biochemical stimuli, tissue engineered scaffolds) affect scar tissue function and material quality in multiple different types of tendons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.