Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35339690›Full record

SynthesisTravel medicine and infectious disease

Influenza vaccine improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa, Jose Saucedo-Chinchay, Mamas A Mamas, Lourdes Vicent

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Travel medicine and infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Does influenza vaccination contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular events? An umbrella review.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Platelet versus plasma CXCL14, coronary artery disease, and clinical outcomes.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023
    Article
  13. What if flu vaccination is the most responsible thing to do for cardiovascular health in the upcoming season?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Can COVID-19 vaccines improve cardiovascular outcomes?Travel medicine and infectious disease
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Carlos Diaz-ArocutipaVicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru. Electronic address: cdiazar@usil.edu.pe.
Jose Saucedo-ChinchayDepartment of Emergency, Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru.
Mamas A MamasKeele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Lourdes VicentCardiology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia · PEInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESKeele University · GBUniversidad San Ignacio de Loyola · PE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are inconsistent data on the clinical benefit of the influenza vaccine on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of the influenza vaccine on cardiovascular outcomes in CAD patients.

methodsWe searched four electronic databases from inception to September 21, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of influenza vaccine in CAD patients were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and myocardial infarction. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Effect sizes were expressed as risk ratio (RR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI). All meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

resultsFive RCTs involving 4211 patients were included. The mean age ranged from 54.5 to 67 years and 75% of patients were men. Influenza vaccine significantly reduced the risk of MACE (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.51-0.77), all-cause mortality (RR, 058; 95% CI, 0.4-0.84) and cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.74) compared to control group. The risk of myocardial infarction was similar between both groups (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.47-1.02). The certainty of the evidence was low for MACE, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality and was very low for myocardial infarction.

conclusionsOur review shows that the influenza vaccine may reduce cardiovascular events in CAD patients. Therefore, we suggest that it be actively applied as part of secondary prevention in this population.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCoronary Artery DiseaseInfluenza VaccinesMyocardial InfarctionAgedCause of DeathFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSecondary PreventionInfluenza VaccinesCoronary artery diseaseInfluenza vaccineSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35339690
OpenAlexW4220873713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.