Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35339585›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2022

Support for evidence-informed opioid policies and interventions: The role of racial attitudes, political affiliation, and opioid stigma.

Maria Pyra, Bruce Taylor, Elizabeth Flanagan, Anna Hotton, O'Dell Johnson, Phoebe Lamuda, John Schneider, Harold A Pollack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria PyraDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Bruce TaylorNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Elizabeth FlanaganNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Anna HottonDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
O'Dell JohnsonUniversity of Arkansas Faye Boozman College of Public Health Southern Public Health and Criminal Justice Research Center, Little Rock, AR, United States of America.
Phoebe LamudaNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
John SchneiderDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America; Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Harold A PollackCrown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America; Urban Health Lab, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Electronic address: haroldp@uchicago.edu.

Funding

Survey CoreU2CDA050098 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI POLLACK, HAROLD ALEXANDER, SCHNEIDER, JOHN · 2019 to 2019
$17.2M
NIDA NIH HHS U2C DA050098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Political affiliation, racial attitudes, and opioid stigma influence public support for public health responses to address opioid use disorders (OUD). Prior studies suggest public perceptions of the opioid epidemic are less racialized and less politically polarized than were public perceptions of the crack cocaine epidemic. Analyzing a cross-sectional, nationally representative sample (n = 1161 U.S. adults) from the October 2020 AmeriSpeak survey, we explored how political affiliation, racial attitudes (as captured in the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale [CoBRAS]), and OUD stigma were associated with respondents' expressed views regarding four critical domains. Respondents with unfavorable attitudes towards Black Americans were less likely to support expanding Medicaid funding, increasing government spending to provide services for people living with OUD, and distributing naloxone for overdose prevention. Democratic Party affiliation was associated with greater support for all three of the above measures, and increased support for mandatory treatment, which may be seen as a substitute for more punitive interventions. Black respondents were also less likely to support expanding Medicaid funding, increasing government spending to provide services for people living with OUD, and of distributing naloxone. Our finding suggest that negative attitudes towards African-Americans and political differences remain important factors of public opinion on responding to the OUD epidemic, even after controlling for opioid stigma. Our findings also suggest that culturally-competent dialogue within politically conservative and Black communities may be important to engage public support for evidence-informed treatment and prevention.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNaloxonePolicyUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneOpioid treatmentOpioid usePolitical affiliationRacismStigmaSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID35339585
PMCPMC9153069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.