Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35339254›Full record

ReviewSeminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR2022

Radiomics: A Primer on Processing Workflow and Analysis.

Emily Avery, Pina C Sanelli, Mariam Aboian, Seyedmehdi Payabvash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Redefining oropharyngeal cancer in the HPV era: integrating precision medicine and immunotherapeutic frontiers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily AveryDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Pina C SanelliNorthwell Health, and Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY.
Mariam AboianDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Seyedmehdi PayabvashDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Electronic address: sam.payabvash@yale.edu.

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001862 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LLOYD G, EDELMAN, E. JENNIFER · 2016 to 2025
$12.2M
Short-Term Reserch Training: Students in Health SchoolsT35HL007649 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Sarwat I Chaudhry, Erica L Herzog · 1987 to 2026
$5.7M
Radiomics Signatures and Patient Outcomes in Intracerebral HemorrhageK23NS118056 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Seyedmehdi Payabvash · 2021 to 2026
$780k
Comparative Effectiveness of Imaging Strategies in Acute Ischemic Stroke Based on Patient Profiles - Resubmission - 1R56NS114275 · NINDS · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI SANELLI, PINA CHRISTINE · 2020 to 2020
$628k
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 2020097NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001862NHLBI NIH HHS T35 HL007649NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS118056NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS114275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative analysis of medical images can provide objective tools for diagnosis, prognostication, and disease monitoring. Radiomics refers to automated extraction of a large number of quantitative features from medical images for characterization of underlying pathologies. In this review, we will discuss the principles of radiomics, image preprocessing, feature extraction workflow, and statistical analysis. We will also address the limitations and future directions of radiomics.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID35339254
PMCPMC8961004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.