ArticleInfant behavior & development2022
Object label and category knowledge among toddlers at risk for autism spectrum disorder: An application of the visual array task.
Article in Infant behavior & development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) demonstrate atypical development of receptive language and object category knowledge. Yet, little is known about the emerging relation between these two competencies in this population. The present study utilized a gaze-based paradigm, the visual array task (VAT), to examine the relation between object label and object category knowledge in a sample of toddlers at heightened genetic risk for developing ASD. Eighty-eight toddlers with at least one typically developing older sibling (low-risk; LR) or one older sibling diagnosed with ASD (high-risk; HR) completed the VAT at 17 (LR n = 20; HR n = 27) and/or 25 months of age (LR n = 42; HR n = 22). Results indicated that the VAT was both a sensitive measure of receptive vocabulary as well as capable of reflecting gains in category knowledge for toddlers at genetic risk of developing ASD. Notably, an early emerging difference in the relation between target label knowledge and category knowledge for the groups was observed at 17 months of age but dissipated by 25 months of age. This suggests that while the link between receptive vocabulary and category knowledge may develop earlier in LR groups, HR groups may potentially catch up by the second year of life. Therefore, it is likely meaningful to consider differences in category knowledge when conceptualizing the receptive language deficits associated with HR populations. During language learning, typically developing children are sensitive to the common features of category members and use this information to generalize known object labels to newly encountered exemplars. The inability to identify similarities between category members and/or utilize this information when learning new object referents at 17 months of age may be a potential mechanism underlying the delays observed in HR populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.