ArticleHuman brain mapping2022
The effect of acquisition duration on cerebral blood flow-based resting-state functional connectivity.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arterial spin labeling reveals disordered cerebral perfusion and cerebral blood flow-based functional connectivity in primary open-angle glaucoma.Brain imaging and behavior · 2024Article
- The effect of acquisition duration on cerebral blood flow-based resting-state functional connectivity.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) is widely used to examine the functional architecture of the brain, and the blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) signal is often utilized for determining rs-FC. However, the BOLD signal is susceptible to various factors that have less influence on the cerebral blood flow (CBF). Therefore, CBF could comprise an alternative for determining rs-FC. Since acquisition duration is one of the essential parameters for obtaining reliable rs-FC, we investigated the effect of acquisition duration on CBF-based rs-FC to examine the reliability of CBF-based rs-FC. Nineteen participants underwent CBF scanning for a total duration of 50 min. Variance of CBF-based rs-FC within the whole brain and 13 large-scale brain networks at various acquisition durations was compared to that with a 50-min duration using the Levene's test. Variance of CBF-based rs-FC at any durations did not differ from that at a 50-min duration (p > .05). Regarding variance of rs-FC within each large-scale brain network, the acquisition duration required to obtain reliable estimates of CBF-based rs-FC was shorter than 10 min and varied across large-scale brain networks. Altogether, an acquisition duration of at least 10 min is required to obtain reliable CBF-based rs-FC. These results indicate that CBF-based resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) with more than 10 min of total acquisition duration could be an alternative method to BOLD-based rs-fMRI to obtain reliable rs-FC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.