Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35338569›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2022

Service integration: The perspective of Australian alcohol and other drug (AOD) nurses.

Adam Searby, Dianna Burr, Russell James, Phil Maude

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Barriers and Facilitators to Mental Health Service Integration: A Scoping Review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam SearbyInstitute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7457-3221
Dianna BurrInstitute for Health Transformation, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Russell JamesSchool of Nursing, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0995-5586
Phil MaudeLa Trobe Rural Health School, Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, Latrobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0662-5007

Funding

Deakin UniversityDrug and Alcohol Nurses of Australasia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recently released Victorian Mental Health Royal Commission report has recommended a shift to integrated treatment, defined as treatment for alcohol and substance use disorders and mental ill health occurring in parallel, rather than distinct systems catering to each need. However, little work has sought to determine the perceptions of nurses working in alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment towards integrating with mental health services. In this study, we explore the perspectives of specialist AOD nurses towards the integration of mental health and AOD treatment services. Secondary analysis of semi-structured interviews with Australian specialist AOD nurses (n = 46) conducted as part of a wider workforce study in 2019. Data were analysed using thematic analysis and reported using the COREQ guidelines. Of the interviews analysed, six were AOD nurses working in an Australian state that had recently undergone service integration; however, many participants expressed perceptions of service integration. Two key themes are reported in this paper: (i) perceptions of service integration, where AOD nurses participating in our study were concerned that integration would result in the model of care they worked under being replaced by a mental health-based model that was felt to be highly risk averse, and (ii) experiences of service integration. Concerns about the focus of care as well as the complexity of care differing between the two services demonstrated a contrast in both philosophical approaches to work with consumers and legislative difference in voluntary versus compulsory care provision.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesSubstance-Related DisordersAustraliaHumansdelivery of health caredual diagnosis (psychiatry)integratedmental health nursesmental health servicessubstance abuse treatment services

Identifiers

PMID35338569
PMCPMC9314025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.