ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023
[Use of Video Online Seminars During Clinical Phase of Medical Study from the Perspective of Teachers and Students].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aim of the studyThe aim of this study was to investigate the opportunities and challenges of using video online seminars (VOS) in the clinical phase of medical studies from the perspective of teachers and students. METHODOLOGY: Teachers and medical students from the 5th to the 10th semester completed questionnaires about their attitudes towards and experiences with VOS. Recommended procedures for VOS were derived from the results.
resultsA total of 19 teachers and 108 students participated in this study; 67% of students found VOS helpful in the clinical phase of the degree course. Cognitive learning objectives (91% agreement) should be taught more often in the VOS format than affective learning objectives (71% agreement). However, 83% stated that VOS did not prepare them for future practical activities. Teachers indicated that cognitive (77% agreement) could be significantly better communicated than affective learning objectives (only 27% agreement). For two-thirds of the teachers, support or trainings were important. Good technical conditions were important for both groups. DISCUSSION/
conclusionsThe study shows the option of individual learning regardless of location to be an advantage of VOS. A teaching format is considered to be particularly useful if successful interaction between teacher and student takes place. In the context of blended learning concepts with preceding lectures and subsequent practical exercises, the learning success of VOS is greatest. Cognitive and some affective learning objectives can be achieved by this method. VOS can prepare for practical exercises, but they are not suitable in medical education for comprehensive teaching of practical learning objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.