Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35338378›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2023

Metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT): past, present, and future.

Steffen Moritz, Mahesh Menon, Ryan Balzan, Todd S Woodward

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06312241 (Feasibility, Acceptance and Efficacy of Metacognitive Training-Silver BeWell in Older Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06312241 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility, Acceptance and Efficacy of Metacognitive Training-Silver BeWell in Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsDepressive Symptoms, Well-Being, PsychologicalArmsMetacognitive Training-Silver BeWell
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Towards an integrative neuroscience of metacognition.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Self-Reflection Protects Behavior from Volatile Beliefs Linked to Paranoia.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Development of the trainer skill evaluation scale for metacognitive training.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Steffen MoritzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. moritz@uke.uni-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8601-0143
Mahesh MenonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Ryan BalzanCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia.
Todd S WoodwardDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Flinders University · AUUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of British Columbia · CAVancouver Coastal Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article provides an overview and retrospective on metacognitive training for psychosis (MCT), which first appeared approximately 2 decades ago. We recount how our empirical understanding of psychosis at that time led to the first preliminary version of the program. We describe setbacks and challenges that led to major changes, including revisions to existing modules (e.g., more focus on metacognitive variables, particularly on decision confidence as one of the primary targets of treatment) and the creation of new modules addressing mood, as well as attempts to improve sustainability of effects via homework exercises and a smartphone app ( www.uke.de/mct_app ). We have also enhanced dissemination efforts by creating new culturally sensitive language versions and facilitating low-threshold training through e-learning courses ( www.uke.de/e-mct ). Finally, we discuss several meta-analyses on the efficacy of MCT that have been published over the last decade. While reviews were initially inconsistent, possibly reflecting the insufficient statistical power and lower design quality of the first MCT studies, more recent meta-analyses have confirmed the efficacy of MCT on positive symptoms, insight, and cognitive biases, which has led to the inclusion of MCT in some national treatment guidelines for schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMetacognitionPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCognitive biasesMetacognitive trainingPsychosisSchizophreniaSocial cognition

Identifiers

PMID35338378
PMCPMC8956140
OpenAlexW4220864801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.