Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35338327›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2022

Can we detect biomarkers of oral squamous cell carcinoma from saliva or mouth swabs?

Gemma Gaw, Mark Gribben

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gemma GawDental Core Trainee Year 2, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK. gemma.gaw@nhs.scot.
Mark GribbenDental Core Trainee Year 2, Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, UK.
Forth Valley Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim To determine the accuracy of using saliva and oral cytology swabs in the diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) by detecting aberrantly hypermethylated DNA.Data sources Electronic databases including PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Web of Science with no language or article restrictions. Additionally, LILACS database, OpenGrey and Google Scholar were searched.Study selection Studies published since the first report proposing DNA hypermethylation for head and neck carcinomas in 2001 until 2020 were included. The diagnoses of oral cancer were limited to OSCC. Authors screened titles and abstracts for relevance, before further screening of full texts and a consensus for inclusion was reached. Qualitative analysis was conducted on 22 studies, and 11 were selected for meta-analysis.Data analysis Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed using a series of investigations including the Haldane-Anscombe correction, forest plots, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and Deeks' funnel plots. Differences in the pooled estimates of the application of both single and combined hypermethylation markers were assessed using Cochran's Q test and Higgins' I2 test. Random-effects meta-regression analysis was used to evaluate the effects of variation in sensitivity and false-positive rates, and to identify sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses removed outliers.Results All studies suggest that DNA hypermethylation can discriminate between OSCC and premalignant conditions or normal mucosa. Using summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, the sensitivity of combined markers was higher than single markers, and specificity of both combined and single markers was comparable. The biomarkers evaluated had fair-to-excellent sensitivity and good-to-excellent specificity for discriminating OSCC from premalignant and normal mucosa. Four studies included in the review suggest that this method of detection is more applicable to patients who smoke due to increased hypermethylation rates.Conclusion Hypermethylation markers using saliva and oral swabs are more specific than sensitive for OSCC diagnosis. Combining different genes within the biomarker panel can improve diagnostic test accuracy. However, more blinded evaluation study designs with less bias which replicate real-world application are required to endorse the use of saliva sampling and oral swabs in oral oncology.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsMouth NeoplasmsBiomarkersHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicReview Literature as TopicSalivaSensitivity and SpecificitySquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID35338327
OpenAlexW4220749762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.