Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35338201›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Zero retinal vein pulsation amplitude extrapolated model in non-invasive intracranial pressure estimation.

W H Morgan, A Vukmirovic, A Abdul-Rahman, Y J Khoo, A G Kermode, C R Lind, J Dunuwille, D Y Yu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantifying Lateral Pulsation in Retinal Vessels Within the Optic Disc.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

W H MorganLions Eye Institute, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. billmorgan@lei.org.au.
A VukmirovicLions Eye Institute, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
A Abdul-RahmanLions Eye Institute, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
Y J KhooLions Eye Institute, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
A G KermodeCentre for Neuromuscular and Neurological Disorders, Perron Institute AU, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
C R LindNeurosurgical Service of Western Australia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
J DunuwilleDepartment of Neurology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia.
D Y YuLions Eye Institute, Centre for Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
University of Western Australia · AULions Eye Institute · AUMurdoch University · AUSir Charles Gairdner Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial pressure (ICP) includes the brain, optic nerve, and spinal cord pressures; it influences blood flow to those structures. Pathological elevation in ICP results in structural damage through various mechanisms, which adversely affects outcomes in traumatic brain injury and stroke. Currently, invasive procedures which tap directly into the cerebrospinal fluid are required to measure this pressure. Recent fluidic engineering modelling analogous to the ocular vascular flow suggests that retinal venous pulse amplitudes are predictably influenced by downstream pressures, suggesting that ICP could be estimated by analysing this pulse signal. We used this modelling theory and our photoplethysmographic (PPG) retinal venous pulse amplitude measurement system to measure amplitudes in 30 subjects undergoing invasive ICP measurements by lumbar puncture (LP) or external ventricular drain (EVD). We estimated ICP from these amplitudes using this modelling and found it to be accurate with a mean absolute error of 3.0 mmHg and a slope of 1.00 (r = 0.91). Ninety-four percent of differences between the PPG and invasive method were between - 5.5 and + 4.0 mmHg, which compares favourably to comparisons between LP and EVD. This type of modelling may be useful for understanding retinal vessel pulsatile fluid dynamics and may provide a method for non-invasive ICP measurement.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticRetinal VeinHumansIntracranial PressureOptic NerveSpinal Puncture

Identifiers

PMID35338201
PMCPMC8956690
OpenAlexW4220811707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.