Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35338187›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A computational framework for canonical holistic morphometric analysis of trabecular bone.

Sebastian Bachmann, Christopher J Dunmore, Matthew M Skinner, Dieter H Pahr, Alexander Synek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. SwartkransProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Trabecular Architecture of the Proximal Tibia in Extant Hominids.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Identification of functionally related adaptations in the trabecular network of the proximal femur and tibia of a bipedally trained Japanese macaque.Anthropological science : journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon = Jinruigaku zasshi · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sebastian BachmannInstitute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria. bachmann@ilsb.tuwien.ac.at.
Christopher J DunmoreSchool of Anthropology and Conservation, Skeletal Biology Research Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Matthew M SkinnerSchool of Anthropology and Conservation, Skeletal Biology Research Centre, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Dieter H Pahr *Institute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander Synek *Institute of Lightweight Design and Structural Biomechanics, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
TU Wien · ATMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEUniversity of Kent · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone is a remarkable, living tissue that functionally adapts to external loading. Therefore, bone shape and internal structure carry information relevant to many disciplines, including medicine, forensic science, and anthropology. However, morphometric comparisons of homologous regions across different individuals or groups are still challenging. In this study, two methods were combined to quantify such differences: (1) Holistic morphometric analysis (HMA) was used to quantify morphometric values in each bone, (2) which could then be mapped to a volumetric mesh of a canonical bone created by a statistical free-form deformation model (SDM). Required parameters for this canonical holistic morphometric analysis (cHMA) method were identified and the robustness of the method was evaluated. The robustness studies showed that the SDM converged after one to two iterations, had only a marginal bias towards the chosen starting image, and could handle large shape differences seen in bones of different species. Case studies were performed on metacarpal bones and proximal femora of different primate species to confirm prior study results. The differences between species could be visualised and statistically analysed in both case studies. cHMA provides a framework for performing quantitative comparisons of different morphometric quantities across individuals or groups. These comparisons facilitate investigation of the relationship between spatial morphometric variations and function or pathology, or both.

Indexed as

Cancellous BoneFemurAnimalsBone and BonesPrimates

Identifiers

PMID35338187
PMCPMC8956643
OpenAlexW4221104147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.