Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35338142›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Community voices: NIH working toward inclusive excellence by promoting and supporting women in science.

Kelly G Ten Hagen, Carrie Wolinetz, Janine A Clayton, Marie A Bernard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Authorship and citation trends in dementia research: A path to equitable career development for scientists.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Actionable Solutions to Achieve Health Equity in Chronic Liver Disease.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly G Ten HagenNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2057-8120
Carrie WolinetzOffice of Science, Technology, and Policy, White House, Washington, DC, USA.
Janine A ClaytonOffice of Research on Women's Health, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Janine.clayton@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-2981-3622
Marie A BernardOffice of the Chief Officer for Scientific Workforce Diversity, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. marie.bernard@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-3807-8009
National Institutes of Health · USOffice of Science · USOffice of the Director · US

Funding

Role of O-glycosylation in Animal DevelopmentZIADE000713 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI TEN HAGEN, KELLY G · 2009 to 2025
$30.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

WomenFemaleHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)ScienceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35338142
PMCPMC8956673
OpenAlexW4220725905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.