Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35338036›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of sports medicine2022

Early versus delayed lengthening exercises for acute hamstring injury in male athletes: a randomised controlled clinical trial.

Robin Vermeulen, Rod Whiteley, Anne D van der Made, Nicol van Dyk, Emad Almusa, Celeste Geertsema, Stephen Targett, Abdulaziz Farooq, Roald Bahr, Johannes L Tol and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 5 countries.

Robin VermeulenDepartment of Research, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar drrvermeulen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9456-8892
Rod WhiteleyDepartment of Physiotherapy, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-6228
Anne D van der MadeDepartment of Research, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7280-6439
Nicol van DykDepartment of Research, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0724-5997
Emad AlmusaDepartment of Radiology, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Celeste GeertsemaDepartment of Sports Medicine, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5439-7451
Stephen TargettDepartment of Sports Medicine, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Abdulaziz FarooqDepartment of Research, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9162-4948
Roald BahrDepartment of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5725-4237
Johannes L TolAcademic Center for Evidence Based Sports Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, North Holland, The Netherlands.
Arnlaug WangensteenDepartment of Research, Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the efficacy of early versus delayed introduction of lengthening (ie, eccentric strengthening) exercises in addition to an established rehabilitation programme on return to sport duration for acute hamstring injuries in a randomised controlled superiority trial.

methods90 male participants (age: 18-36 years, median 26 years) with an MRI-confirmed acute hamstring injury were randomised into an early lengthening (at day 1 of rehabilitation) group or a delayed lengthening (after being able to run at 70% of maximal speed) group. Both groups received an established rehabilitation programme. The primary outcome was time to return to sport (ie, time from injury to full unrestricted training and/or match play). The secondary outcome was reinjury rate within 12 months after return to sport. Other outcomes at return to sport included the Askling H-test, hamstring strength, clinical examination and readiness questions.

resultsThe return to sport in the early lengthening group was 23 (IQR 16-35) days and 33 (IQR 23-40) days in the delayed lengthening group. For return to sport (in days), the adjusted HR for the early lengthening group compared with the delayed lengthening group was 0.95 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.60, p=0.84). There was no significant difference between groups for reinjury rates within 2 months (OR=0.94, 95% CI 0.18 to 5.0, p=0.94), from 2 to 6 months (OR=2.00, 95% CI 0.17 to 23.3, p=0.58), and 6 to 12 months (OR=0.57, 95% CI 0.05 to 6.6, p=0.66).

conclusionAccelerating the introduction of lengthening exercises in the rehabilitation of hamstring injury in male athletes did not improve the time to return to sport nor the risk of reinjury.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesHamstring MusclesLeg InjuriesReinjuriesSoft Tissue InjuriesAdolescentAdultAthletesHumansMaleReturn to SportYoung Adultexercise therapyhamstring musclesrandomized controlled trialrehabilitationwounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID35338036
PMCPMC9252858
OpenAlexW4221113399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.